District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/4/1981
Dean v. State
Citations
- 406 So. 2d 1162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a law enforcement officer’s testimony was sufficient to identify a substance as marijuaña -where the evidence showed that the officer had substantial experience' in narcotics' investigations and was trained to'recognize marijuana
- holding that a law enforcement officer's testimony was sufficient to identify a substance as marijuana where the evidence showed that the officer had substantial experience in narcotics investigations and was trained to recognize marijuana
- holding that a law enforcement officer's testimony was sufficient to identify a substance as marijuana where the evidence showed that the officer had substantial experience in narcotics investigations and was trained to recognize marijuana
- permitting a police officer with \substantial experience in narcotics investigation\ to identify marijuana
- finding a law enforcement officer's testimony sufficient to sustain a conviction for possession of marijuana where the officer had substantial experience in narcotics investigations and was trained to recognize marijuana
- finding a law enforcement officer's testimony sufficient to sustain a conviction for possession of marijuana where the officer had substantial experience in narcotics investigations and was trained to recognize marijuana
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grimes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-25· cited 172×
- Hill v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-01-22· cited 69×
- A.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-04· cited 38×
- Pama v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-17· cited 23×
- Williamson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-08· cited 16×
- Sinclair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-03· cited 14×
- Boyington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-07-09· cited 13×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-27· cited 9×
- Bragg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-13· cited 7×
- Newsome v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-26· cited 7×
- R.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-25· cited 5×
- S.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-18· cited 4×
- AA v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-04· cited 1×
- SW v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-18
- R.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-11
- State v. LindbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-30
- Downey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-18
- J.W.V. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-05
- Campbell v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-03-26
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,879×
- Robbins v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 503×
- Spataro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-11-02· cited 117×
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-09-26· cited 42×
- State v. RaulersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-09-16· cited 24×
- State v. HutchinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-05· cited 19×
- Sommers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-26· cited 11×
- Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-03-28· cited 6×
- Blair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-05-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.