Skip to main content

Bray v. State

Citations

  • 75 So. 3d 749
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6755
  • 2011 WL 1820821

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding probation officer’s testimony about drug test without qualifying officer as expert was inadmissible hearsay
  • finding “the testimony of. the, community control officers was hearsay” because “neither testified as to any expertise as to narcotics or drug,testing”
  • finding “the testimony of the community control officers was hearsay” because “neither testified as to any expertise as to narcotics or drug testing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Nortwick, Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.