Skip to main content

Weaver v. State

Citations

  • 543 So. 2d 443
  • 1989 WL 53464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the officer’s testimony about the field test results, standing alone, could not support the finding of a violation where the officer did not even know the name of the field test or that it was reliable
  • insufficient evidence to revoke probation based on a charge of trafficking in heroin where no expert testimony or laboratory reports were introduced in evidence at the probation revocation hearing establishing that the substance sold by the defendant was, in fact, heroin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Baskin and Ferguson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.