Cochran v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is axiomatic that a person may waive the privilege against self-incrimination.... There can be no waiver if the defendants do not know their rights.”
• \It is axiomatic that a person may waive the privilege against self-incrimination. . . . There can be no waiver if the defendants do not know their rights.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Hof v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-03-10· cited 80×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-06-24· cited 36×
• Milton v. Cochran
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1962-10-17· cited 34×
• State v. Lo Sacco
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-09-22· cited 32×
• People v. Cervantes
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-12-14· cited 29×
• People v. Kramer
  California Court of Appeal· 1964-05-13· cited 25×
• People v. Solomos
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-08-17· cited 19×
• Moffett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-10-29· cited 16×
• Martin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-01-13· cited 14×
• Lett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-04-30· cited 9×
• In Interest of GGP
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-02· cited 7×
• People v. Guice
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-05-14· cited 7×
• In the Interest of R. V. P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-18· cited 5×
• State v. Dwyer
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-01-06· cited 3×
• People v. Barnum
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-04-18· cited 3×
• State v. Lucas
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1963-02-06· cited 3×
• State v. Agresta
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1968-03-15· cited 3×
• Osgood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-11-04· cited 1×
• In re Amendment to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar-Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-09-28· cited 1×
• Amend. to Regulating Fla. Bar Rule 4-1.5
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-09-28

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wood v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1942-03-09· cited 124×
• Ex parte Senior
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1896-01-15· cited 68×
• Killpatrick v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1957-08-07· cited 39×
• Sims v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 39×
• State ex rel. Corcoran v. Chapel
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1896-02-06· cited 24×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1925-10-08· cited 20×
• People v. Chlebowy
  New York Supreme Court· 1948-04-07· cited 9×