Maloy v. State
Citations
- 52 Fla. 101
Syllabus
<p>1. In a prosecution for homicide testimony tending to show the personal feeling between the accused and the deceased and to disclose a motive for the crime is admissible.</p> <p>2. As a general rule, motions to strike testimony that has been introduced in a prosecution for homicide must be predicated upon some feature of irrelevancy, imcompetency, legal inadmissibility or impertineney in the testimony itself, and testimony should not be stricken on. the ground that it is not sufficient proof of what was intended to be proved by the party introducing it.</p> <p>3. In a prosecution for homicide testimony as to pending litigation between the deceased and the defendant at the time of' the homicide is not rendered inadmissible because “it was not shown that there was any personal feeling or words between them.”</p> <p>4. In the absence of proper objections and exceptions, an , assignment of error that the court erred in the manner of its cross-examination- of the defendant, a witness for himself, can not be considered by the appellate court.</p> <p>5. In a. criminal prosecution a defendant taking the stand as a witness may, as a witness, be impeached.</p> <p>6. In the absence of proper exceptions to the rulings of the court in admitting or rejecting testimony su6h rulings will not be considered when assigned as error in the appellate court.</p> <p>7. Where, in a criminal prosecution, the defendant has testified as a witness, the testimony of other witnesses as to the credibility of the defendant “as a witness in the case being tried” is inadmissible, and should be stricken on motion, since the credibility of the defendant as a witness in the case being tried is a question for the jury to determine. The enquiry should be confined to the general reputation of the defendant for truth and veracity, as affecting his testimony in any and all cases in which he may be a witness.</p> <p>8. In a prosecution for homicide where the testimony shows that the difficulty was precipit
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Clinton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 60×
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 39×
- Moore v. LanierSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 31×
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-10-26· cited 24×
- Bowles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-03-19· cited 22×
- Platt v. RowandSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 20×
- Ammons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-12-16· cited 19×
- Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-11-17· cited 16×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 15×
- Kirkland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-12-21· cited 14×
- Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-06-15· cited 12×
- Wrobel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-02-17· cited 10×
- Peeler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 10×
- Story v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1951-07-31· cited 9×
- Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 9×
- Childers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-11-13· cited 9×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-11-11· cited 8×
- Bonner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-05-26· cited 8×
- Hollingsworth v. NorrisSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-04-21· cited 7×
- Whitten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1921-08-12· cited 4×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 157×
- Eggart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 52×
- Sylvester v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 36×
- Wilson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 32×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-01-15· cited 30×
- Boykin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 30×
- Binns v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1877-05-15· cited 29×
- Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 23×
- Kirby v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1902-01-15· cited 21×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 21×
- McCoggle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 20×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1888-01-15· cited 19×
- Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-06-15· cited 16×
- Milton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-01-15· cited 16×
- Easterlin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 16×
- Roten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-01-15· cited 14×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1902-01-15· cited 14×
- State ex rel. City of New Orleans v. EllisSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1904-08-19· cited 14×
- Lawrence v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 13×
- Leaptrot v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.