Skip to main content

Julian v. State

Citations

  • 811 N.E.2d 392
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 1205
  • 2004 WL 1445112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding investigator could provide opinion fire was intentionally set but not provide opinion it was the defendant who set the fire
  • permissible for an arson investigator to testify that the fire was set intentionally because investigator did not testify that the defendant intended to set the fire
  • no abuse of discretion in rejecting mitigator that defendant would respond well to probation 5 or short-term imprisonment; trial court considered proposed mitigator and rejected it due to defendant’s history of misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Kirsch, Najam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.