Skip to main content

Sieg Co. v. Kelly

Citations

  • 568 N.W.2d 794
  • 1997 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 243
  • 1997 WL 575996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • surveying Iowa cases and statutes and observing that “[t]he term ‘good faith’ has various meanings; sometimes it is viewed objectively and at other times, subjectively”
  • compiling various cases’ definitions of good faith and including Meyers in the “subjective” category
  • applying statute that, like North Carolina’s, is patterned on the Model Business Corporation Act: “[a]s we have observed on prior occasions, there is no predominant formula for arriving at fair value”
  • “[C]laims of fraud, self-dealing or breach of fiduciary duty ... are separate and distinct and can be redressed outside the appraisal remedy.”
  • “[r]he narrow remedy provided by an appraisal action does not encompass claims of fraud, self-dealing or breach of fiduciary duty.... ”
  • noting the reconcilability of Weinberger and RMBCA § 13.02(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson, Carter, Snell, Andreasen, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Sieg Co. v. Kelly

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.