New Mexico Supreme Court· 6/27/2007
McMinn v. MBF Operating Acquisition Corp.
Citations
- 164 P.3d 41
- 142 N.M. 160
- 2007 NMSC 040
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing the party’s acquiescence throughout trial to the rule stated in the jury instruction
- emphasizing the party’s acquiescence throughout trial to the rule stated in the jury instruction
- emphasizing the party’s acquiescence throughout trial to the rule stated in the jury instruction
- “our statute does not reflect legislative attention to the current dilemma,” and thus its text may be disregarded
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bosson, Chávez, Serna, Maes, Castillo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Salas v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-02-04· cited 38×
- State v. TorrezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-06-27· cited 35×
- Peters Corp. v. New Mexico Banquest Investors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-06-24· cited 24×
- Clark v. SimsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-07-27· cited 15×
- Sound Infiniti, Inc. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-06-23· cited 11×
- Sound Infiniti, Inc. ex rel. Pisheyar v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-06-23
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-02-01· cited 690×
- Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-07-10· cited 331×
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 318×
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-03-07· cited 289×
- M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le BeauSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-05-27· cited 201×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-09-16· cited 194×
- Cavalier Oil Corp. v. HarnettSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-09-05· cited 154×
- Hovet v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-04-08· cited 121×
- Cummings v. X-Ray Associates of New Mexico, P. C.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-05-31· cited 103×
- Pueblo Bancorporation v. Lindoe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2003-01-21· cited 77×
- Nagy v. BistricerCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2000-11-22· cited 68×
- Fought v. MorrisMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-04-19· cited 65×
- International Telecharge, Inc. v. Bomarko, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2000-12-01· cited 65×
- Sealy Mattress Co. of New Jersey v. Sealy, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1987-07-24· cited 62×
- Delaware Open MRI Radiology Associates, P.A. v. KesslerCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2006-04-26· cited 60×
- Tome Land & Improvement Co. v. SilvaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1972-01-21· cited 54×
- Mayeux v. WinderNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-12-21· cited 47×
- Steinberg v. Amplica, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1986-12-31· cited 46×
- Couch v. Astec Industries, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-06-19· cited 44×
- Cohen v. Mirage Resorts, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court· 2003-02-07· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.