Oakridge Energy, Inc. v. Clifton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when sale terms were announced on May 24 and sale was approved and closed on September 28 but made effective as of May 1, fair-value valuation date was pre-May
• interpreting identical language to exclude increases or decreases in value caused by the corporate action
• “[A] dissenting shareholder disclaims both the burden and the benefit of the disfavored corporate action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).