Davis-Eisenhart Marketing Co. v. Baysden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing attorney-fee award against corporation where dissenter demanded more than his own appraiser said the stock was worth
• finding no abuse of discretion in refusal to award attorney fees where “disparity [between corporation’s offer and court’s fair-value determination] was not so great as to constitute sanctionable conduct”
• reviewing decision to deny attorney fees in an appraisal action for an abuse of discretion
• reviewing decision to deny attorney fees in an appraisal action for an abuse of discretion
• giving weight to district court credibility determinations in a minority shareholder val- uation suit where “the trial court found certain valuation witnesses more credible than others”
• giving weight to district court credibility determinations in a minority shareholder val- uation suit where “the trial court found certain valuation witnesses more credible than others”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).