Skip to main content
· 4/11/1991

Kahn v. Household Acquisition Corp.

Citations

  • 591 A.2d 166
  • 1991 Del. LEXIS 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding disclosure of an agreement in principle on government subsidy was not material information requiring supplemental disclosure
  • holding supplemental disclosure not required about an agreement that was not definitive
  • “[T]hat which plaintiff characterizes as an ‘agreement in principle’ had been reached at the staff level and was subject to approval, and possible modification, at the [government agency] level.”
  • “Estoppel and acquiescence are related doctrines of equity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christie, Horsey, Walsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.