Ninth Circuit· 8/17/2007
Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.
Citations
- 498 F.3d 976
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19560
- 2007 WL 2332068
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that appellant argued class proceedings would hinder the “speed, simplicity, cost savings, informality, and reduced adversariality” of arbitration and lead to companies abandoning arbitration
- noting that individual damages of less than $1,000 qualify as small amounts for the purpose of determining whether class action waivers are enforceable under California law
- noting that appellant argued class proceedings would hinder the “speed, simplicity, cost savings, informality, and reduced adversariality” of arbitration and lead to companies abandoning arbitration
- noting that individual damages of less than $1,000 qualify as small amounts for the purpose of determining whether class action waivers are enforceable under California law
- holding class action waiver in cellular phone contract unconscionable under California law
- finding “individual damages in the hundreds of dollars” to be “an objectively small amount” and “a small enough sum to satisfy” the requirement that the arbitration agreement occur in a setting in which disputes will predictably involve small amounts of damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Reinhardt, Rymer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Omstead v. Dell, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2010-02-05· cited 262×
- Fiser v. Dell Computer CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-06-27· cited 95×
- Rosenfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.N.D. California· 2010-08-09· cited 84×
- Lowden v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Ninth Circuit· 2008-01-22· cited 59×
- Feeney v. Dell Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-07-02· cited 58×
- In Re American Express Merchants'litigationSecond Circuit· 2009-01-30· cited 53×
- Rogers v. Royal Caribbean Cruise LineNinth Circuit· 2008-11-06· cited 49×
- Skirchak v. Dynamics Research Corp.First Circuit· 2007-11-19· cited 45×
- Chalk v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Ninth Circuit· 2009-03-27· cited 38×
- Hoffman v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.Ninth Circuit· 2008-10-14· cited 37×
- Frankel v. Citicorp Insurance Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-11-30· cited 34×
- Arguelles-Romero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-05-20· cited 32×
- In Re Apple & AT & TM Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2008-10-01· cited 31×
- In re Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig.N.D. California· 2018-03-09· cited 29×
- Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-06-09· cited 28×
- Oestreicher v. Alienware Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2009-04-02· cited 26×
- Blessing v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.S.D. New York· 2010-11-17· cited 20×
- McArdle v. AT & T MOBILITY LLCN.D. California· 2009-09-14· cited 18×
- Metropcs California, LLC v. Michael PickerNinth Circuit· 2020-08-14· cited 18×
- Fensterstock v. Education Finance PartnersSecond Circuit· 2010-07-12· cited 17×
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 3,702×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 2,861×
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,844×
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,684×
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court· 1991-05-13· cited 2,511×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 1,691×
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 1,668×
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 1,269×
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,187×
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court· 1984-01-11· cited 1,181×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court· 2002-01-15· cited 1,129×
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationNinth Circuit· 2006-12-04· cited 1,006×
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 976×
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court· 2000-05-22· cited 903×
- Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court· 1995-04-18· cited 675×
- Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court· 2003-06-23· cited 523×
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court· 2000-03-22· cited 468×
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 370×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.