Fiser v. Dell Computer Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to enforce parties’ contractual choice-of-law provision because it “r[a]n afoul of fundamental New Mexico public policy” (emphasis added)
• “Substantive unconscionability relates to the content of the contract terms and whether they are illegal, contrary to public policy, or grossly unfair.”
• “New Mexico respects party autonomy; the law to be applied to a particular dispute may be chosen by the parties through a contractual choice-of-law provision.”
• also noting that “[w]hether contractual terms are ambiguous is a question of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).