Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 7/2/2009

Feeney v. Dell Inc.

Citations

454 Mass. 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding contractual choice-of law-provision unenforceable because applying selected state's law would contravene fundamental policy of forum state
suggesting plaintiffs’ allegations on appeal could conceivably state claim under G. L. c. 93A if properly pleaded
reversing, after entry of final judgment, order allowing motion to compel arbitration and invalidating arbitration clause purporting to ban class action
allowing the plaintiffs to re-plead six years after commencement of this action
“ ‘[t]rade or commerce’ refers to transactions in a ‘business context,’ which, in turn, is ‘determined by the facts of each case’ ”
\we may consider any ground apparent on the record that supports the result reached in the trial court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Feeney v. Dell Inc.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.