Skip to main content
· 7/24/1992

Ramsey v. Ramsey

Citations

  • 834 P.2d 807
  • 1992 Alas. LEXIS 95
  • 1992 WL 172500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there is \no fixed rule\ requiring credit for post-separation payments made to maintain marital property
  • stating that date of valuation should be \as close as practicable\ to date of trial
  • stating that date of valuation should be \as close as practicable\ to date of trial
  • holding no fixed rule requiring credit in all cases should be imposed
  • stating that there is \no fixed rule requiring credit in all cases\ and that payments from separate income should be considered as one of the circumstances to be weighed by the trial court in dividing the marital estate
  • stating trial courts have authority to credit a spouse in the final property division for payments made from post-separation income to maintain marital property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.