Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 6/20/2014

Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

  • 2014 UT 21
  • 330 P.3d 704
  • 2014 Utah LEXIS 84
  • 763 Utah Adv. Rep. 25
  • 2014 WL 2808136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Tjhe district court is not bound by a specific prescribed approach in determining the most equitable distribution of pension benefits following the dissolution of a marriage, but should evaluate all relevant factors and circumstances in making such a determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nehring, Durrant, Durham, Parrish, Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.