Ruggles v. Ruggles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the rule for distribution of a non[-]employee[-]spouse’s interest in a retirement plan, whatever the rule is, should be applied only in the absence of an agreement between the spouses on the subject”
• defining dicta in an opinion as language “not essential to determination of the case in hand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).