C.M. Asfahl Agency v. Tensor Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that post-verdict motion to disregard jury finding on question of law submitted in the jury charge was insufficient to preserve error where complaining party failed to object to submission of the question at issue
• finding no successor liability because there was no express assumption by the successor to acquire the liability of the predecessor
• stating general rule that interlocutory summary judgment is final as to issues addressed when rendered and becomes final and appealable when merged into final judgment
• holding appellant waived complaint 12 that trial court erred by denying its motion to disregard as immaterial jury finding on legal question and entering judgment consistent with the jury’s finding where appellant did not timely assert any challenge to the court’s charge
• rejecting an appellant’s contention that error was preserved through their motion for new trial because the 16 appellant did not object to the issue of segregation in the attorney’s fees question as submitted in the charge
• legal sufficiency challenge preserved by motion for directed verdict, motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, objection to submitting issue to jury, motion to disregard jury finding on issue, or motion for new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).