SITQ E.U., Inc. v. Reata Restaurants, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting fiduciary shield doctrine does not apply when nonresident is subject to specific personal jurisdiction based on commission of intentional torts or fraudulent acts for which he may be held individually liable
• “[A] defendant should reasonably anticipate being haled into court where the effects of [her] conduct have been intentionally caused through that purposeful direction of activity toward the forum state, even if the defendant never physically enters the state.”
• “[A] defendant should reasonably anticipate being haled into court where the effects of [her] conduct have been intentionally caused through that purposeful direction of 19 activity toward the forum state, even if the defendant never physically enters the state.”
• “[A] defendant should reasonably anticipate being haled into court where the effects of [her] conduct have been intentionally caused through that purposeful direction of 19 activity toward the forum state, even if the defendant never physically enters the state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).