Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 1/23/2008

Shakur v. Schriro

Citations

  • 514 F.3d 878
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 1255
  • 2008 WL 185496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “sincerity 13 test,” not the “centrality test,” applies to a free exercise analysis
  • litigants waive arguments by failing to raise them in an 20 opposition to a motion to dismiss
  • “Given the Supreme Court’s disapproval of the centrality test, we are satisfied that the sincerity test … determines whether the Free Exercise Clause applies.”
  • no evidence supported 10 contention that other prisoners would demand the same treatment, and no 11 evidence that defendant had looked into the cost of request
  • relying on Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 (1987)
  • adopting Malik’s formulation 20 of the sincerity test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Diarmuid, O'Scannlain, Hawkins, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

109 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Shakur v. Schriro

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.