Dunn v. Castro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the right of a prisoner to receive visits from his children in 4 the factual circumstances of this case was not clearly established”
• stating that the Ninth Circuit and other federal appeals courts have “declined to recognize a prisoner’s constitutional right to receive visits” and collecting cases
• holding 11 the right to freedom of association is limited in prison, thus, imposition of a prison 12 regulation preventing a prisoner from visitation with his children was permissible
• collecting Ninth Circuit cases “declin[ing] 22 to recognize a prisoner’s constitutional right to receive visits[ ]”
• incorporating by reference documents identified 7 in operative complaint and considering when ruling on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion
• noting the application 25 of Turner facts at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage is premature because there is an absence of adequate factual findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).