Nelson v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the response to plaintiff’s grievance showed that officials understood what the grievance entailed and thus they were put on notice of his claims
• affirming the District Court’s dismissal as moot of an RLUIPA claim because there was no evidence that the prison intended to revoke the plaintiff’s religious diet
• affirming the District Court’s dismissal as moot of an RLUIPA claim because there was no evidence that the prison intended to revoke the plaintiffs religious diet
• failing to provide a non-meat diet during Lent and on Fridays substantially burdened the religious practice of a Roman Catholic prisoner
• declining to read Congress’s permission to seek “appropriate relief against a government” in § 2000cc-2(a) as permitting damages claims under RLUIPA against prison officials in their individual capacities
• discussing the cessation of conduct vis-à-vis mootness of a claim for injunctive relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).