Skip to main content

Seay v. State

Citations

  • 698 N.E.2d 732
  • 1998 Ind. LEXIS 96
  • 1998 WL 377843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant is alleged to be a habitual offender has a right to have a jury determine whether he or she is a habitual offender, “irrespective of the uncontroverted proof of prior felonies”
  • \determining the habitual offender penalty is clearly different from determining habitual offender status \
  • “determining the habitual offender penalty is clearly different from determining habitual offender status”
  • describing the role of the jury in Indiana habitual-offender proceedings
  • describing the role of the jury in Indiana habitual-offender proceedings
  • describing the role of the jury in Indiana habitual-offender proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Selby, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.