Skip to main content
· 1/12/2012

Dexter v. State

Citations

  • 959 N.E.2d 235
  • 2012 Ind. LEXIS 3
  • 2012 WL 95620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing habitual offender enhancement finding and holding State was not barred from retrying defendant on the enhancement
  • reversing habitual offender enhancement and remanding for resentencing, stating, “[R]etrial on a sentencing enhancement based on a prior conviction is permitted even where the enhancement is reversed because of insufficient evidence.”
  • “[Retrial on a sentencing enhancement based on a prior conviction is permitted even where the enhancement is reversed because of insufficient evidence.”
  • “[R]etrial on a sentencing enhancement based on a prior conviction is permitted even where the enhancement is reversed because of insufficient evidence.”
  • “[R]etrial on a sentencing enhancement based on a prior conviction is permitted even where the enhancement is reversed because of insufficient evidence.”
  • a collateral attack is permitted during habitual offender proceedings only if “the court documents on their face raise a presumption that the conviction is constitutionally infirm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Rucker, David

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.