Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 825 N.E.2d 783
  • 2005 Ind. LEXIS 385
  • 2005 WL 903500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the General Assembly could have a judge rather than a jury decide whether a sentence enhancement applies based on prior convictions
  • repeat sexual offender status determinations need not be made by a jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.