Skip to main content
· 2/16/1968

State v. Brusenhan

Citations

  • 438 P.2d 174
  • 78 N.M. 764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the defendant’s right to appeal the revocation of his probation under the rules and statutory provisions in existence at that time
  • recognizing the defendant’s right to appeal the revocation of his probation under the rules and statutory provisions in existence at that time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oman, Spiess, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.