Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/4/2005

Evans v. State

Citations

  • 611 S.E.2d 510
  • 363 S.C. 495
  • 2005 S.C. LEXIS 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding subject matter jurisdiction is not implicated in challenges to the legality of the process of the grand jury
  • stating a defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of a grand jury indictment does not implicate the subject matter jurisdiction of the trial court
  • noting all the surrounding circumstances must be weighed to make an accurate determination of whether the defendant was prejudiced by a lack of notice and an insufficient indictment
  • noting an “issue or argument which is neither raised at PCR hearing nor ruled upon by the PCR court is procedurally barred from appellate review” (citation omitted)
  • noting an “issue or argument which is neither raised at PCR hearing nor ruled upon by the PCR court is procedurally barred from appellate review” (citation omitted)
  • noting an “issue or argument which is neither raised at PCR hearing nor ruled upon by the PCR court is procedurally barred from appellate review” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.