State v. Langford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining how Legislature closed a loophole in 1947 by defining a conviction under DUI statutes to include bond forfeitures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gentry
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-03-07· cited 229×
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 161×
• Kisner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-04-09· cited 31×
• State v. Fennell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-10-30· cited 24×
• Scott v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-16· cited 21×
• Elletson v. Dixie Home Stores
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-07-25· cited 19×
• State v. Crocker
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-10-31· cited 17×
• State v. Dudley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-14· cited 17×
• State v. Randolph
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-08-23· cited 13×
• Thomas v. Colonial Stores, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1960-03-15· cited 13×
• Babb v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-05-08· cited 11×
• Shelton v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-02-12· cited 8×
• State v. Douglas
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-11-10· cited 6×
• Bayly v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-04-04· cited 5×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sherrod v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1916-06-30· cited 27×
• State v. Faile
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1895-01-09· cited 25×
• Morris v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1918-10-15· cited 2×