Idaho Supreme Court· 12/1/2000
Cole v. State
Citations
- 15 P.3d 820
- 135 Idaho 107
- 2000 Ida. LEXIS 124
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that petitioner’s “statement, requesting leave to amend if his counsel so suggests, is not a specific request to the court for leave to amend” because it only contemplates that petitioner may want leave to amend if his counsel so suggests
- holding: “Because Cole did not properly request and receive leave to amend his post-conviction relief petition, the amended petition was not properly before the district judge; therefore, the district judge did not err in dismissing Cole’s petition.”
- saying in. a post-conviction case, the statute of limitation defense is not a jurisdictional issue that may be raised at any time and it is waived by failure to raise the de fense in the trial court
- “a motion for leave to file an amended petition was required before it was necessary for the district judge to consider the amended petition”
- “a motion for leave to file an amended petition was required before it was necessary for the district judge to consider the amended petition”
- failure to comply with limitation period does not result in a jurisdictional defect
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trout, Silak, Schroeder, Walters, Kidwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-11-30· cited 413×
- Allen v. SiebertSupreme Court· 2007-11-05· cited 215×
- Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-05-10· cited 44×
- Schultz v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-05-09· cited 38×
- Salvador Martinez v. Joe Klauser, WardenNinth Circuit· 2001-09-18· cited 37×
- State v. ArmstrongIdaho Court of Appeals· 2008-08-15· cited 32×
- State v. JensenIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-05-21· cited 15×
- Rodriquez v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2023-02-10· cited 13×
- Nguyen v. BuiIdaho Court of Appeals· 2008-07-21· cited 12×
- Dopp v. Idaho Commission of Pardons & ParoleIdaho Court of Appeals· 2004-01-27· cited 12×
- Kirkland v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2006-10-31· cited 10×
- Monahan v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2008-04-22· cited 9×
- State v. OchiengIdaho Court of Appeals· 2009-04-28· cited 6×
- Hairston v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2020-09-03· cited 5×
- Hairston v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2020-07-06
- Tucker v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2026-03-30
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.