Rankin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although we have never explicitly stated it before, the Court of Appeals’ de novo standard of review over whether to grant equitable tolling, given a set of assumed facts or facts found, is correct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bahr v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-06-28· cited 6×
• Valdovinos v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2025-04-04

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dunlap v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2004-11-30· cited 413×
• Russell v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-07-03· cited 216×
• Larkin v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1988-10-27· cited 147×
• Martinez v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1997-05-30· cited 111×
• Baxter v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-07-09· cited 85×
• Kriebel v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-09-04· cited 49×
• Schultz v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-05-09· cited 38×
• Gonzalez v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2003-11-03· cited 36×
• Evensiosky v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2001-08-02· cited 36×
• Leer v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-07-31· cited 27×
• Ethan Allen Windom v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2017-07-10· cited 16×
• Harvey L. Mahler v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-07-18· cited 9×
• State v. Gutierrez-Medina
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-08-20· cited 6×