Idaho Supreme Court· 10/26/2009
Rhoades v. State
Citations
- 220 P.3d 1066
- 148 Idaho 247
- 2009 Ida. LEXIS 195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a petition for post-conviction relief initiates a proceeding that is civil in nature
- stating that ineffective assistance of counsel is presumed to be known when it occurs
- examining, hypothetically, that even if a prima facie case of actual innocence provided a sufficient reason to justify equitable tolling, the petitioner had not met that burden
- ineffective assistance of counsel claims can or should be known at the conclusion of the underlying proceeding
- “The facts of the case, being particularly within the knowledge of the defendant should be sufficient to alert a defendant to the presence of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horton, Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Walters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-03-17· cited 398×
- Wolf v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-05-20· cited 306×
- Barcella v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2009-11-13· cited 190×
- Gonzales v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-04-12· cited 180×
- Baxter v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-07-09· cited 85×
- Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-05-10· cited 44×
- Schultz v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-05-09· cited 38×
- Schoger v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-02-01· cited 34×
- Rome v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 25×
- Mitchell James Bias v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2015-11-20· cited 24×
- Hoffman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-05-11· cited 17×
- Amboh v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-07-14· cited 14×
- Takhsilov v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2016-11-23· cited 13×
- Rodriquez v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2023-02-10· cited 13×
- Grove v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2017-02-02· cited 11×
- Cody James Fortin v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2016-06-08· cited 10×
- Richard Myers Caldwell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2015-08-14· cited 9×
- Harvey L. Mahler v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-07-18· cited 9×
- State v. HooleyIdaho Supreme Court· 2020-03-09· cited 9×
- Campos v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2019-02-27· cited 8×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 7,671×
- Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court· 2004-02-24· cited 1,098×
- District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 782×
- Goodwin v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2002-10-29· cited 366×
- State v. PayneIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-12-15· cited 235×
- State v. YakovacIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-02-13· cited 193×
- Charboneau v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2007-11-21· cited 188×
- Pizzuto v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-02-22· cited 148×
- Martinez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1997-05-30· cited 111×
- State v. RhoadesIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-09-12· cited 80×
- State v. RhoadesIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-02-01· cited 77×
- Phillips v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1985-04-26· cited 56×
- Sayas v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2003-12-03· cited 52×
- Balderson v. BaldersonIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 39×
- Gilpin-Grubb v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2002-10-23· cited 31×
- Hopper v. HopperIdaho Supreme Court· 2007-03-19· cited 29×
- Chico-Rodriguez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2005-02-16· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.