D. Maryland· 11/13/2003
Schultz v. Braga
Citations
- 290 F. Supp. 2d 637
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20736
- 2003 WL 22705544
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that supervisor’s knowledge of one previous unconstitutional incident is insufficient to establish supervisory liability
- striking “inflammatory” allegations about prior shooting by FBI agent because their relevance had not yet been determined and they were prejudicial to the agent’s repuation
- striking “inflammatory” allegations about prior shooting by FBI agent because their relevance had not yet been determined and they were prejudicial to the agent’s reputation
- striking “inflammatory” allegations about prior shooting by FBI agent because their relevance had not yet been determined and they were prejudicial to the agent’s reputation
- “Thus, qualified immunity protects law enforcement officers from bad guesses in gray areas and ensures that they are liable only for transgressing bright lines.”
- a motion to strike should be granted when the “allegations have no possible relation to the controversy and may cause prejudice to one of the parties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Motz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLPD. Maryland· 2014-02-20· cited 208×
- Schultz v. BragaFourth Circuit· 2006-07-31· cited 81×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 2006-07-31· cited 1×
- Bretemps v. Town of BrentwoodD. Maryland· 2014-03-24· cited 1×
- Roberson v. Ginnie Mae Remic Trust 2010 H01D. Maryland· 2013-09-25· cited 1×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 16,485×
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court· 1985-03-27· cited 4,272×
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 3,271×
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court· 1984-08-16· cited 2,605×
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
- Shaw v. StroudFourth Circuit· 1994-01-06· cited 1,804×
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 1,685×
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageFirst Circuit· 1993-02-09· cited 1,204×
- Hill v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 764×
- Trulock v. FreehFourth Circuit· 2001-12-28· cited 708×
- Pritchett v. AlfordFourth Circuit· 1992-08-19· cited 382×
- Rowland v. PerryFourth Circuit· 1994-11-29· cited 274×
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.D. Maryland· 1991-08-15· cited 231×
- Elliott v. LeavittFourth Circuit· 1996-11-26· cited 227×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.