Schultz v. Braga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that supervisor’s knowledge of one previous unconstitutional incident is insufficient to establish supervisory liability
• striking “inflammatory” allegations about prior shooting by FBI agent because their relevance had not yet been determined and they were prejudicial to the agent’s repuation
• striking “inflammatory” allegations about prior shooting by FBI agent because their relevance had not yet been determined and they were prejudicial to the agent’s reputation
• striking “inflammatory” allegations about prior shooting by FBI agent because their relevance had not yet been determined and they were prejudicial to the agent’s reputation
• “Thus, qualified immunity protects law enforcement officers from bad guesses in gray areas and ensures that they are liable only for transgressing bright lines.”
• a motion to strike should be granted when the “allegations have no possible relation to the controversy and may cause prejudice to one of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).