Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Fourth Circuit· 8/19/1992

Pritchett v. Alford

Citations

  • 973 F.2d 307
  • 1992 WL 198926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The third, which involves application of Harlow’s objective test to that particular conduct at issue, may require factual determinations respecting disputed aspects of that conduct.”
  • \[T]he most obvious possibility [of exceptional circumstances sup- porting qualified immunity despite the violation of a clearly estab- lished constitutional right] is mistaken official advice by legal counsel.\
  • “If there are genuine issues of historical fact respecting the officer’s conduct or its reasonableness under the circumstances, summary judgment is not appropriate, and the issue must be reserved for trial.”
  • “If there are genuine issues of historical fact respecting the officer’s conduct or its reasonableness under the circumstances, summary judgment is not appropriate, and the issue must be reserved for trial.”
  • “If there are genuine issues of historical fact respecting the officer’s conduct or its reasonableness under the circumstances, summary judgment is not appropriate, and the issue must be reserved for trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carolina, Ervin, Middle, Osteen, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

176 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Pritchett v. Alford

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.