Roberts v. Holland & Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an affiant’s projection of net profit was too speculative without an explanation for how the total had been calculated
• holding claim for lost profits may be recoverable in legal malpractice action when traceable to and direct result of attorney’s negligence
• holding claim for lost profits may be recoverable in legal malpractice action when traceable to and direct result of attorney’s negligence
• assigning legal malpractice claims is against public policy reflected in professional rules prescribing attorney’s duties of confidentiality and loyalty
• assigning legal malpractice claims is against public policy reflected in professional rules prescribing attorney’s duties of confidentiality and loyalty
• contractual assignment of legal malpractice claims contravenes public policy embodied in the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct that attorneys owe clients duties of loyalty and confidentiality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).