Skip to main content
· 4/23/1996

Kiley v. Jennings, Strouss & Salmon

Citations

  • 927 P.2d 796
  • 187 Ariz. 136
  • 215 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 15
  • 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that ascertainable, not speculative or contingent, damages are required before a claim for legal malpractice accrues
  • finding no exception if the minor or individual 10 is appointed a guardian or conservator
  • such assignments would negate attorney’s fiduciary and ethical duty to client because assignee is not client
  • whether parties were of unsound mind, which would have tolled statute of limitations, was factual question for jury
  • “[A] cause of action for legal malpractice cannot be assigned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Noyes, Ehrlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.