Albers v. Edelson Technology Partners L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing similar statute and holding that “[t]empting as it might be to imply a futility exception, we must follow the language of [the statute], which is clear and admits of no exception”
• “We are required to view the complaint as a whole to determine whether a claim for fraud has been stated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).