Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the duty owed to a business invitee, as defined in the Restatement Second of Torts § 332 (1965), \may be diluted or extinguished if the invitee engages in explicitly or impliedly unpermitted activities\
• declining to find that an implied invitation extended to unpermitted areas when the landowner gave a strict warning on the few occasions when an invitee went into uninvited areas
• \The particular duty owed to the entrant on the land is defined by the entrant's status.\
• \The particular duty owed to the entrant on the land is defined by the entrant's status.\
• “[L]andowners have a duty to invitees to maintain their property in a 19 reasonably safe manner.”
• Arizona courts generally follow Restatement unless rules, statutes, or caselaw have adopted contrary positions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).