Nevada Supreme Court· 3/24/1999
Schoels v. State
Citations
- 975 P.2d 1275
- 115 Nev. 33
- 1999 Nev. LEXIS 11
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an error is harmless if in absence of the error the outcome would have been the same
- noting that an error is harmless if in absence of the error the outcome would have been the same
- noting that an error is harmless if in absence of the error the outcome would have been the same
- stating that the rule in Brown was not constitutionally demanded and had prospective application only
- observing that an error is harmless if in absence of the error the outcome would have been the same
- observing that an error is harmless if in absence of the error the outcome would have been the same
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rose, Young, Maupin, Shearing
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Blake v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 81×
- Diomampo v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 68×
- Rowland v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-01-24· cited 60×
- Richmond v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-12-27· cited 56×
- Tabish v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2003-07-14· cited 41×
- BELCHER, JR. (NORMAN) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-06-04· cited 26×
- Hughes v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-11-22· cited 12×
- Allan v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-01-22· cited 9×
- Walker (James) Vs. State (Death Penalty-Pc)Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-06-19
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.