Skip to main content

Schoels v. State

Citations

  • 975 P.2d 1275
  • 115 Nev. 33
  • 1999 Nev. LEXIS 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an error is harmless if in absence of the error the outcome would have been the same
  • noting that an error is harmless if in absence of the error the outcome would have been the same
  • noting that an error is harmless if in absence of the error the outcome would have been the same
  • stating that the rule in Brown was not constitutionally demanded and had prospective application only
  • observing that an error is harmless if in absence of the error the outcome would have been the same
  • observing that an error is harmless if in absence of the error the outcome would have been the same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose, Young, Maupin, Shearing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.