Gier v. Ninth Judicial District Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying general rule that “[n]ew rules apply prospectively unless they are rules of constitutional law” and concluding that new rule announced in Sheriff v. Marcum, 105 Nev. 824, 783 P.2d 1389 (1989
• applying general rule that \[n]ew rules apply prospectively unless they are rules of constitutional law\ and concluding that new rule announced in Sheriff v. Marcum, 105 Nev. 824, 783 P.2d 1389 (1989
• applying general rule that “[n]ew rules apply prospectively unless they are rules of constitutional law” and concluding that new rule announced in Sheriff v. Marcum, 105 Nev. 824, 783 P.2d 1389 (1989), was “not constitutionally mandated” and therefore “applies only prospectively”
• applying general rule that \[n]ew rules apply prospectively unless they are rules of constitutional law\ and concluding that new rule announced in Sheriff v. Marcum, 105 Nev. 824, 783 P.2d 1389 (1989), was \not constitutionally mandated\ and therefore \applies only prospectively\
• addressing new rule involving notice to target of grand jury proceedings
• new rules prospective unless they are rules of constitutional law, in which case they may apply retroactively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).