Diomampo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Batson is concerned with the improper removal of potential jurors through peremptory challenges
• explaining that the district court's determination regarding the question of discriminatory purpose is given \great deference\ on appeal
• explaining that discriminatory jury selection in violation of Batson constitutes structural error that requires reversal
• observing that this court has \not reach fed] the issue of whether using a peremptory challenge to dismiss a minority juror because of a true language barrier constitutes de facto discrimination\
• stating that \Mlle trial court's determination to admit or exclude evidence of prior bad acts is a decision within its discretionary authority and is to be given great deference\ (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that \Mlle trial court's determination to admit or exclude evidence of prior bad acts is a decision within its discretionary authority and is to be given great deference\ (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).