Ninth Circuit· 12/19/2005

United States v. Mark Lamond Willis

Citations

431 F.3d 709
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28032
2005 WL 3454681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that officer’s observation of a traffic violation provided “specific and articulable facts” to justify the stop
holding a lawful traffic stop occurred even though the defendant had parked his car before the officers made the stop
noting that Fourth Amendment case law “require[s] that the officers have reasonable suspicion to stop a driver for traffic infractions, not that the officers issue citations”
applying reasonable suspicion standard to a traffic stop based on readily observed traffic violations
applying reasonable suspicion standard to a traffic stop based on readily observed traffic violations
upholding a stop when the officer issued no traffic citations but “could have relied on the traffic violation as a justification” for the stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.