United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose Reyna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court must review de novo magistrate’s findings and recommendations if objection is made, “but not otherwise”
• clarifying that a district judge “must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.”
• stating that a “district judge must 3 review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 4 otherwise”
• stating that a “district judge must 24 review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 25 otherwise”
• reiterating that “to the 8 extent de novo review is required to satisfy Article III concerns, it need not be exercised 9 unless requested by the parties”
• providing that the district court must make a 8 de novo determination of any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that a party has 9 properly objected to

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).