Skip to main content
· 2/27/1996

Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corporation, United States Ex Rel. Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corporation

Citations

  • 77 F.3d 1170
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1253
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 2114
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 136
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3145
  • 1996 WL 80451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Contrary to the defendants’ assertions, Dominator’s motion for leave to amend its complaint was properly treated as a nondispositive motion.”
  • “[A] party who fails to file timely objections to a magistrate judge’s nondispositive order with the district judge to whom the case is assigned forfeits its right to appellate review of that order.”
  • “[A] party who fails to file timely objections to a magistrate judge’s nondis-positive order with the district judge to whom the case is assigned forfeits its right to appellate review of that order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Kleinfeld, Wilken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.