· 2/27/1996
Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corporation, United States Ex Rel. Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corporation
Citations
- 77 F.3d 1170
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1253
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 2114
- 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 136
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3145
- 1996 WL 80451
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Contrary to the defendants’ assertions, Dominator’s motion for leave to amend its complaint was properly treated as a nondispositive motion.”
- “[A] party who fails to file timely objections to a magistrate judge’s nondispositive order with the district judge to whom the case is assigned forfeits its right to appellate review of that order.”
- “[A] party who fails to file timely objections to a magistrate judge’s nondis-positive order with the district judge to whom the case is assigned forfeits its right to appellate review of that order.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Kleinfeld, Wilken
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.