Schmersahl, Treloar & Co., PC v. McHugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in part, that a noncompete agreement constituted an unenforceable restrictive covenant in restraint of trade, since it did not seek to protect proprietary information or customer contacts but, rather, the stability of plaintiff’s workforce
• a covenant not to compete may protect either customer contacts or trade secrets
• “The law’s policy favors free competition when no agreement provides otherwise[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).