Brown v. Rollet Bros. Trucking Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding trucking company’s use of restrictive covenants to prevent disclosure of customer list and pricing information was not reasonably necessary to protect business
• “Evidence of purported trade secrets must be sufficiently specific to allow a court to make a determination.”
• non-compete agreement unenforceable where unreasonably broad as to customer contacts and business information covered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).