Continental Research Corp. v. Scholz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to enforce non-compete agreement beyond former employee’s previously assigned territory, where no protectable customer contacts or trade secrets affected
• noting record disclosed insignificant competition by former employee, concluding no legitimate purpose of employer served by injunctive relief extending non-compete clause
• “[T]o the extent a non-compete agreement is not demonstrably reasonable, a court may not decree enforcement of its terms”
• “A survey of the authorities reveals that such automatic time extension provisions are almost uniformly disapproved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).