Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. v. May Department Stores Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding geographic and temporal restrictions were not unreasonably restrictive on the employee, and the employee could still practice his business of veterinary medicine
• “A restrictive covenant in an employment agreement is only valid and enforceable if it is necessary to protect trade secrets and customer contacts.”
• covenants not to compete \are enforceable only to protect against unfair competitive use of either customer contacts or trade secrets\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).