Schott v. Beussink

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[i]ndividuals associating for the purpose of causing or inducing a breach of contract is a basis for an unlawful conspiracy”
• discussing Missouri public policy of protecting a company’s “proprietary right in its stock of customers and their good will”
• stating Missouri courts recognize public policy approves contracts containing restrictive covenants because an entity has a proprietary right in it customers and goodwill
• “Temporary and spatially limited restraints are enforceable if reasonable under all attending circumstances and if enforcement serves the employer’s legitimate interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).