Skip to main content

Satterfield v. State

Citations

  • 483 Md. 452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, “as a matter of law, the facts alleged do not afford Petitioner relief[]”
  • “Rule 4-707(a) neither requires the circuit court to await or consider [a p]etitioner’s response nor entitles [a p]etitioner to a response.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hotten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.